Distributed Cognition 2

I am in a first grade classroom and the students in my class use technology to enhance their learning. During this lesson, the students use something called Seesaw on their chrome books. Seesaw is used by the teacher and the students. The teacher is able to assign things using seesaw and then the students can see what assignments that they have to complete. The students in my classroom use seesaw for mostly math work. The students use their chrome books to log into seesaw. Once the students log into their accounts, they can see the assignments that the teacher has assigned to each student. The thing that is so great about this is the teacher can assign specific assignments to each student. We have some students that are very behind in class and some students that are very advanced. This way, the teacher can assign assignments that are at the students level. 

According to the article, “Applying Distributed Cognition Theory to the Redesign of the ‘Copy and Paste’ function in Order to Promote Appropriate Learning Outcomes “(Morgan et al.)  distributed cognition is explained as, “A way to understand how people interact with their environment and how they can be enabled by the environment to undertake highly complex tasks that would usually be beyond the abilities of the unassisted individual” (Morgan et al.). In this lesson the students were really working on their own, but at times, the students sometimes work with one another. For example, if a student is struggling with a question then a student may help another student out. This environment enabled the students learning because they are able to have assignments that are catered to where they are at with learning. Technology also enabled the students’ learning because they are able to access educational games with ease. The effects of technology are also present in this lesson According to the article, “Do Technologies Make Us Smarter? Intellectual Amplification With, of, and Through Technology (Salomon and Perkins) the effects of technology are explained as ” using technology may leave cognitive residue that enhances performance even without the technology” (Salomon and Perkins 77). It is clear that the technology that was used in this lesson helped my students learn as they were able to play games that they would not be able to play without technology. The students really enjoy playing these educational games because they are having fun while learning. The teacher can also use this as a formative assessment because she can see the scores that the students are getting on their activities. Looking at the question, will technology make students smarter? I don’t know if the technology itself will make the students smart. But rather the way that you use the technology can make a student smarter because the games that they play can help them practice their math skills.

Morgan, M., Brickell, G., Harper, B. (2008). Applying distributed cognition theory to the redesign of the ‘Copy and Paste’ function in order to promote appropriate learning outcomes.  Computers & Education, 50(1), 125-147.

Salomon, G. & Perkins, D. (2005)”Do Technologies Make Us Smarter? Intellectual Amplification With, Of and Through Technology.” In: Robert Sternberg and David Preiss (Eds.).Intelligence and Technology: The Impact of Tools on the Nature and Development of Human Abilities. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Publishers. pp. 71-86.

Advertisement

Distributed Cognition 1

I am in a first grade classroom and we are learning about inflected endings. During the lesson, the children were sitting on the carpet and the teacher was using the smartboard during the lesson. The teacher tends to use the smartboard to help enhance the students’ learning. They often use the smartboard as a whole class and the students are able to come up and solve the problems on their own. In this lesson, we had the students come up to the board and circle the words that had the inflected endings that we were learning about at the time. Instead of just having the students sit at their desks and do this activity on a worksheet, we used technology in the lesson. This way, we could have a discussion about why the students selected each word. 

According to the article, “Applying Distributed Cognition Theory to the Redesign of the ‘Copy and Paste’ function in Order to Promote Appropriate Learning Outcomes “(Morgan et al.)  distributed cognition is explained as, “A way to understand how people interact with their environment and how they can be enabled by the environment to undertake highly complex tasks that would usually be beyond the abilities of the unassisted individual” (Morgan et al.). In my lesson, the students were interacting with the teacher as well as interacting with the rest of their classmates. The students were having a discussion on if they thought each word had an inflected ending. This environment enabled the students’ learning because they were able to show what they know to the class and it also can be helpful for students to see what other students are thinking. This also encourages the students to ask questions if they got a different answer from another student. The effects of technology are also present in this lesson According to the article, “Do Technologies Make Us Smarter? Intellectual Amplification With, of, and Through Technology (Salomon and Perkins) the effects of technology are explained as ” using technology may leave cognitive residue that enhances performance even without the technology” (Salomon and Perkins 77). It is clear that the technology that was used in this lesson helped my students learn as they were able to explain how they got the answer later on because of this lesson. I also used this activity as a formative assessment because I was able to quickly pick up on which students were able to find the inflected endings and which were not. Looking at the question, will technology make students smarter? I don’t know if the technology itself will make the students smart. But rather the way that you use the technology can make a student smarter.

Morgan, M., Brickell, G., Harper, B. (2008). Applying distributed cognition theory to the redesign of the ‘Copy and Paste’ function in order to promote appropriate learning outcomes.  Computers & Education, 50(1), 125-147.

Salomon, G. & Perkins, D. (2005)”Do Technologies Make Us Smarter? Intellectual Amplification With, Of and Through Technology.” In: Robert Sternberg and David Preiss (Eds.).Intelligence and Technology: The Impact of Tools on the Nature and Development of Human Abilities. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Publishers. pp. 71-86.

Observation 2

The people in my school that are in charge of the technologies available are the teachers and the tech guy. There is a person who is in charge of all of the technology but he is for the entire district so he is spread very thin. He is almost never in the building so it is very difficult to reach out to him for any help. This then becomes the teachers having to deal with all of the technology issues. 

I am in first grade and the students at my school each have a chrome book but they are not allowed to take them home. These chrome books stay in a cart which is located in the classroom so it is easy to access. 

The technologies are readily available to the students because they are able to access their chrome books right in their classroom. The students gain access to their chrome books by logging into chrome books using a QR code. Each student has their own QR code that is on their desk, they can easily get their code out and scan it and then they are logged in and ready to go. The school provides these chrome books and the students do not have to purchase them. 

In my classroom, the teacher has set very strict rules with the chrome books, if they misuse the technology then they do not get access to the chrome books. This has actually gone very well in my classroom, we rarely have students that are not doing what they are supposed to be doing. 

The person that I am speaking with is my cooperating teacher. Their role is the main teacher in the first grade classroom. Mrs. Monroe is the person that was able to give me the most information because she is the one that experiences the students using the technology first hand.

Observation 1 – ED-386

Observing the students in your classroom

  1. The students use an app called SplashLearn in my classroom for reading and math practice. 
  2. The students in my classroom use SplashLearn for mainly math practice but they occasionally use it for reading practice as well. This app allows the teacher to assign certain activities to the students and then they are able to go in through their chromebooks and complete this activity. What is unique about this app is the teacher is able to assign different activities based on the students learning level. 
  3. I think that SplashLearn definitely benefits the students’ learning because the teacher is able to assign students work based on their developmental level. When you are teaching students in a whole group, it can be very hard to cater to all of your students’ learning levels.  
  4. When you are teaching students in a whole group, it can be very hard to cater to all of your students’ learning levels.  

Observing your cooperating teacher

  1. My cooperating teacher uses an app called ClassDojo.
  2. My cooperating teacher uses this app as a way to communicate with the parents in the classroom. She is able to post what the students are doing throughout the day. For example, my students were working on a Halloween project the other day and my teacher went around taking pictures of the students while they were working on their projects. She then posted these pictures to the class feed and all of the parents are able to view what their students are doing and even comment on the pictures!
  3. I think that this app definitely benefits not only the teacher but also the parents. 
  4. I think this because the teacher can document what the class did and it can be a good running record. But also the parents are in the know about what their children are doing while at school!

REVISED- Digital Storytelling Assessment Rubric

Does Not MeetMeetsExceeds Comments

Project Planning
Student fails to submit a script or storyboard. Student shows evidence of a complete script but no storyboard.Student shows evidence of a high quality script and storyboard. A complete storyboard and script was submitted.
Originality, Voice, CreativityStudent shows no originality, voice, and creativity.Student shows some originality, voice, and creativity. Student has no examples from their life.Student shows high quality originality, voice, and creativity. Student shows examples from their life.
StoryStory shows no evidence of a planned out story.Story shows some evidence of development.Story is well developed and well written. The student uses correct grammar. 
Flow, Organization, and PacingVideo has poor flow, organization, and pacing.Video has okay flow, organization, and pacing.Video has great flow, organization, and pacing.
CitationsVideo has no citations.Video has some citations. Some work that is not original is cited.Video has proper citations. All work that is not original is cited. 

Digital Storytelling Assessment Tool

Does Not MeetMeetsExceeds Comments

Project Planning
Student fails to show evidence of script or storyboard. Student shows evidence of the script.Student shows evidence of a high quality script and storyboard.
Originality, Voice, CreativityStudent shows no originality, voice, and creativity.Student shows some originality, voice, and creativity.Student shows high quality originality, voice, and creativity. 
StoryStory shows no evidence of a planned out story.Story shows some evidence of development.Story is well developed and well written.
Flow, Organization, and PacingVideo has poor flow, organization, and pacing.Video has okay flow, organization, and pacing.Video has great flow, organization, and pacing.
CitationsVideo has no citations.Video has some citations. Some work that is not original is cited.Video has proper citations. All work that is not original is cited.